Prevent another Newtown?

Asking how to prevent another disaster like what happened in Newtown Connecticut last month is like asking how to prevent a bank robbery, how to prevent a military attack, or how to prevent violence of any kind.  You can

Posted in Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

The NEW case for privacy

I am the last one to want privacy in my personal affairs.  But I certainly see some situations where people would require, would benefit from, would be best served if the government would aid them with privacy concerns.  The best examples have already been spoiled with the HIPAA unintended consequences and the useful public information it hides.  My book, of course, exploits my First Amendment rights to tell the truth about some of the evil the Microsoft Empire does all around the world. 

But in the wake of Newtown and the Journal New of Westchester and Rockland counties in New York state I see how it should be possible that people could want some information private for no other reason than because there are people who mis-use public information.  More later.

Posted in Book, Case Related, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

I attract these problems.

I got a bill from my friends at the Department of Revenue Services.  You will remember I just went through a full audit from April through August this year, 2012.  Well it is time to have trouble with them again.  Check out this bill. 

So what is this bill for?  I read it and examined it and since it said “for inquiries” I decided to inquire what it was for and called (860) 297-4771 and hit the 2 key.  Refresshingly someone answered right away, but she was very, very curt.  She asked the notice number and said that I had been ond day late paying sales tax in October.  I said, no, I remembered that I had gone on line….  She said HOLD.

Then there was Danny on the line.  I asked who was that rude young woman?  He said it was Pat.  So then I explained how the online service had told me, for the first time ever in 18 years of paying taxes monthly, that the taxes were NOT paid.  And I was not logged on to the site.  So I decided to print a check and mail it.  Apparently you guys didn’t get it in three days…

So Danny says the process for appeals is “cumbersome” and I said I like cumbersome processes.  He said I had to do it on line and I said I preferred to do it by mail.  He said that is not possible, so I just verified his name and Pat’s name and thanked him for his time.  30 seconds later the phone rang and it was Danny.  He said he was mistaken there was a mail form and he would mail me one.  I thanked him. 

So I will let you all know how I make out.

Posted in Audit, Book, Case Related, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

Vandalism, what to do?

My car was vandalized in the Shoprith parking lot last night.  As with every story, there is much more to.  I did not know it was vandalism at first, and it took a lot of investigation to find that it was probably just random…  So let’s start at the beginning.

I just bought this car.  I love it, it is beautiful, standard transmission, small engine, but old and 200k miles.  Cheap but beautiful so it has to have troubles.  Makes strange noises, loose front end, tires were horrible.

So front end work and new tires, still makes some strange noises, but feels solid as a rock and is better on gas than I had imagined.  More power and prettier than the car I blew up, but  that is a different story.  So on my way out of town for its maiden voyage I stop at the grocery store.  When I come out a brand new tire is flat.

I walk home, get the pickup, drive back to get the stuff out of the car which happens to be in the same plaza as the tire dealer who sold me the tires a day earlier.  Make it to my dinner on time.  Come back in the morning when they open and give them hell about a new, yet flat, tire.

They call me a half hour later and say it is vandalism, but since I bought the tire just a day earlier they will give me a new one.  They say four knife holes in the side wall caused the damage.  I decide, after calling the grocery store to see if they have parking lot surveillance, to make a police report. 

Officer Kevin Sultarre badge number 7 promises to check out everything, and by the way do I work on Macs?  He is writing a book about fishing in CT and uses Dragon software so he doesn’t have to type and so I give him a microphone to test, because his suddenly stopped working.  Doubt it is the mic, but anyway…

Badge #7 asked if I thought anyone might be targeting me, and I didn’t think so, but I have had hundreds of tenants in my 6 apartments over the last 20 years, and I have 5000 customer who have not always been happy.  He looked confused, so I asked if his customer were usually happy, and he said NOOOOO.  Badge 7 called dispatch and asked if any other cars had been vandalized.  Negatory, except a few days earlier.

When I picked up my car at TownFair Tire they did not charge me, and said they had four calls of people with tire damage that morning.  So I don’t think I was targeted.

That is all about this for now, but Iwant to say more about the STUPID arrest on the day of my birthday party.  No word.  I filed a Motion to Dismiss, and a Motion to Compel the State to disclose their evidence (which I shouldn’t have to do) and no answer.  I asked for a jury trial, and no word.

Posted in Case Related, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

I’ve been thinking about the site…

What some people do is host many sites, each one limited in scope.  I should keep againstgoliath as the book and the screenplay and all the things that go with it.

Then I should buy new domains to keep things together, to organize things by interest.

Like what interests me now is the stupidity and simplistic thinking in the Republican Party.  I would be Republican if they would not talk about social issues: marriage, religion, abortion, drugs.  No new laws.  Simplify government.  That is what I believe.  But if Republicans want to enforce the existing laws that have made a mess of everything already, well, that is the definition of stupidity. 

If the idea is to simplify government then accept things as they are.  Government is not here to change people, to mold them into little robots that will do what their Republican parents want.  That has never worked.  People rebel and that has to be okay.  Let them experiment with drugs and sex and only get involved when it becomes a problem.  That two men want to get married, well, that is not governmental concern.  That five guys and a girl want to get married, so what?  That the neighbors are outraged doesn’t matter.

Our justice system will go broke if we legalize drugs.  We depend on the revenue from fines and the taxes paid by lawyers to keep people in jail.  It is like our tax system.  We need an industry to help people figure out taxes.  We need people with doctors degrees to interpret tax law so that we can justify our deductions.  Do we need those industries?  It shuffles money, kind of like digging a hole and forcing people to fill it back in by hand.  Keeps everybody busy.

Would we be better off without these industries?  We should see what happens in the third world as they become better off, if they begin suing everyone and forcing complicated taxes in place of the bribes and corruption they have now.  Is paying for 7 permits to rebuild a kitchen better than paying the bribe?  I don’t see the difference.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Talking Points for Lorella

Republicans did not lose the Hispanic vote solely on the issue of immigration, but rather because Republicans only look at issues over-simplified.  In immigration Republicans boil it down to “no amnesty for illegals”.  The number of reasons that is just plain wrong boggles the informed mind.

To be “illegal” with “no amnesty” according to the way Republicans look at it means that, for the rest of your life you will always be illegal.  It is as though you break the speed limit or drive without a seat belt and can never pay a fine or confess or become right with society ever again.  That is what “no amnesty” means. Reagan’s “amnesty” required admission of guilt and paying a fine.  That does not stop the simpleminded from calling it “amnesty” however. 

Remember, crossing the border unexamined or “illegally” is punishable by a fine of $50-$250, like not wearing a seatbelt, but no one will take your money and make you legal again if you cross the border unexamined.  Overstaying a visa is punishable only by deportation.  No other remedy will do short of Deferred Action by the President of the United States. 

This is an example of a system that does not work, and the passing of any law will not fix the situation simply.  It has become a societal issue that directly affects the equivalent populations of  our three largest cities, NYC, Chicago AND LA together.  The people Republicans call “illegal” have extended families and a cash-only economy fueling the “check cashing” industry we see on every corner these days.  Enforcement of existing law is not a reasonable option, and those who understand immigration know that and will not vote Republican because they know the Republican answer is stupid.

American Hispanics come from several different countries, mostly Mexico, but a Peruvian, for example, does not identify with a Mexican any more than an American identifies with and Australian, even though we both speak the same language.  So to block all Spanish speakers together is a problem to begin with. Americans don’t understand the difference, like the old joke that  “Mexicans” from Florida are Cuban.  And Cubans and Puerto Ricans are different voting blocks because they do not have an issue with immigration in America.

Generally American Hispanics are more conservative than Europeans, however, and would be Republicans if Republicans did not oversimplify and wrongly assert their issues. Abortion?  There is a voting block of those who believe in the Right to Life, and Hispanics are largely in that group, being largely Catholic.  But when you involve the Government and the Laws and the Courts and the Police, well, many reasonable people would rather not.  Let’s make it, as much as possible, a personal choice, a family matter.  Let’s not pass any new laws to make any of us who decide we need to abort a family member even more “illegal” than we already might be.

Cuban Americans are different because they have never had an immigration problem and are prohibited by law from sending money to their families in Cuba.  They don’t understand the immigration issues of other Hispanics, and have built their lives entirely on US soil, unlike other Hispanics.  So when Marco Rubio addresses Hispanics it is no wonder those with families in other countries and family members with immigration issues are not attracted.

For many people making a new law is not a solution, but rather the beginning of new problems.  A new law will not automatically solve problems, but it can automatically make us criminals.  Our immigration laws are not working.  Our society is changing and adapting to a secondary economy of “illegals”. Enforcement is not the answer.  We have a huge segment of the population, as many as the entire populations of four or five of our smaller states, who are “illegal” with no remedy according to existing laws.  We have a Congress who cannot act largely because Republicans block all reasonable action, or at least that is the general perception.

Lawmakers want to make new laws.  Republicans see things in stark contrast, black/white, legal/illegal, having options or following the law.  Republicans say they are for less government, but their proposed new laws and the enforcement of immigration laws are not going to simplify anything. Some of us want freedom from this kind of thinking, and only the Democrats protect our freedom from this stark Republican thinking.  It is a shame we need laws to protect our freedom from Republican lawmakers.

 

 

Posted in Audit, Book, Case Related, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

Where Republicans Went Wrong

Democrats complicate things.  They add new laws to protect and defend and give us safety nets and shelter in the rain.  Republicans say they want to simplify, but they don’t.  They put the world in black and white and write and support new laws that try to force the world into this stark vision.

After all, both parties are filled with Law Makers, so they all make new laws.  That is my problem.  We have enough laws.  We need the new Republicans to be the Anti-lawmakers, the simplifiers, the de-regulators, the watchers and reporters, who show us the truth, the transparancy.  We do not need more enforcers and disciplinarians, and an authoritarian regime that is Right when all who disagree are necessarily Wrong.

A Republican Party I could joint, could support, could become enthusiastic about is a Republican Party that doesn’t restrict sex, drugs, rock & roll, dance, religion, rap music, media…  If they would get out of the restrictions and censorship business and really try to simplify government I would join.  Not that I am a Democrat (I am independent) but I would like a party that did not take a stand for or against abortion, gay marriage, health insurance…  My party would try to get the government out of that business.

If a Republican could crusade against stupid laws that Republican Party would be very, very busy.  If the Republican Party Platform could delete any mention of marriage, gay or otherwise, family values, abortion, sex, immigration, drugs, religion, alcohol, crime and punishment…  As it is now, Democrats seem to pass laws to protect us from the possibility that Republicans could, some day, extinguish our civil rights.

If the Party Platform were, for example, that it is NOT the government’s place to enforce, sanction, or otherwise support marriage of any kind, then, we could have true simplification.  Whenever Democrats propose a new law about marriage Republicans could only look to simplify, to oversee but not to meddle.

Equal Rights under the law?  Republicans could be the champions if they would just not meddle, but rather oversee.  Why not propose non-binding UN style arbitration of complicated issues to establish and recognize new, innovative and already common cultural norms?  Why do we need new laws to enforce and punish people for living as they already live.

No one needs to say “we are in favor of legalization of….” anything.  We would say “we don’t want new laws to complicated and cloud the issues”.  The issue becomes to simplify what we have so that fewer people are criminal, fewer go to jail for life style and non-agressive or violent behavior. 

If the Republicans want to re-invent themselves as the conservative party that Americans can support, Republicans need to support deregulation of pretty much everything, including themselves.  Support a smaller Congress, a smaller paycheck, less benefits for themselves.  I guarantee everyone in the world will admire them for that.  Deregulation is called for because of the information revolution.  Support the idea that nothing is hidden, nothing is secret, that if there is something immoral or wrong about anything going on we do not need to imprison, we need to publish. 

Don’t fill our prisons with drug users, prostitutes, non-violent criminals.  Tax them.  Publish their names and addresses.  Stick convictions on their identity so that everyone knows it, and let the society produce the sanctions, not the government.

Posted in Book, Case Related, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

Home Depot’s Deceptions!

I don’t go looking for these cheats.  They find me.  Home Depot makes it IMPOSSIBLE to take their advertised deal.

In this case I wanted to use the deal Home Depot advertises nearly everywhere if you buy on your Home Depot card totals over $299.  In this case Home Depot gave me two different balances to pay to avoid interest payments.  One was written in bold, which I paid, and one was hidden away in fine print, so they could charge me interest.  Judge for yourself.

Account Statement

So if you read the “statement” there are several amounts I could pay,  $25, is the minimum and $847.75 is the total.  If you read carefully you might have noticed that I could pay $113.09 by 6/12 “to avoid paying deferred interest charges” and to pay $564.75 by 1/24/13 to avoid interest.  I paid $115.00 and thought that was it.

But there was another option I did not see.  In its smallest fonts there is a place that says “pay $238.00 by June 21, 2012.”  Yes that is conflicting with other information to pay a different amount on the same date “to avoid … interest”.  But I paid the amount I saw, and I accrued interest.

I wrote this letter:

HomeDepot

Also, this morning I got a letter from them in email, to go to my account for a reply.  But of course it had nothing to do with my complaint, but rather about changing passwords. While signed on I sent the text of the letter I sent to them above:

 “Today I spoke with Julie, Latoia, and Nicole before finally speaking to Pam, the Unit Manager a few minutes ago. I write this to document the facts at the suggestion of offices of consumer protection before bringing a formal case against you for deceptive business practices.

I have attempted to follow your various rules to govern my purchases with Home Depot for your special financing offers. I find them impossible to explain simply, so I will only refer you to my Statement with the payment due date of June 21, 2012. There is no statement date on the page, as you see (attached) but it does say “Pay $564.75 by 1/24/13”, or “$113.09 by 6/21/12” (and I paid $115) but what I did not see was written above that, in smaller font: “pay $238 by June 21, 2012…” a different amount by the same date. 

Because of this deception and/or subterfuge, and some other problems that took a long time to discover and would take even longer to explain, I was charged $10.77 in interest charges despite several calls and my best efforts to follow your rules. 

Please respond to this reasonable request for an explanation of contradictory instructions on your bills and your charges for following the wrong instructions which were printed in larger font than the correct instructions. 

Pam’s final answer was the Home Depot will not answer this complaint. I do not intend to stop here, but rather think you owe an apology to me an all your customers who have tried to follow your obfuscations. I have a web site www.againstgoliath.com that will be posting this blatant example of devious business practice by Home Depot.”

 I also found this other posting about Home Depot’s Deceptions:

http://www.stripersonline.com/t/832007/home-depot-deception-lies-and-screw-ups

http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/u7igh/home_depot_deception/

http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/11/therasense-encouraging-intentional-deception.html

 

 

Posted in Case Related, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

Time for an update…

The Audit is OVER!  Went to a meeting and was told that, low and behold, I was under some sort of arbitrary limit, a percentage of the total in Sales Tax I had paid over the three years and therefore I would not have to pay.  That I would receive a check for about $300 in mid-October for the refunds I requested.

These are the documents Connecticut DRS requested for the audit.

They are slow, arrogant, and borderline competent...

How many people go to an audit and come out with $300 more than they went in with?  Well, this is the second time for me.  During the divorce both my ex and I (when we weren’t talking) claimed the kids as a deduction for Federal Income Tax.  They lived with me more than they lived with her, so I was audited.  I wonder if she was audited….  In any case I went to that audit armed with more deductions, more items to bring down the taxes I owed, and filed an updated return.  Even though I chose not to fight the deductions for the kids, I still got my taxes lowered.

So they requested, in writing, all the above information.  They scheduled three days to be here.  They did not look at the documents, and I don’t think they were here an hour.  They requested some documents via fax and email, but not many.  They get a lot of vacation time, that is for sure.  It took several months for them to not look at the requested documents, two meetings where none would do, and they never asked me how I figured out how much I should pay in Sales Tax until the very end.  Turns out I was right, but I didn’t know about a 1% tax (not 6.35%) on “data processing services” so they owed me a refund.

 We started incredulous at each other why we would disagree about the Statute of Limitations.  I did not want to extend it, they couldn’t understand why, and I couldn’t understand why they couldn’t understand.  We ended with me telling Unit Manager George Hary on September 9, 2012, “I find it insulting that I have been waiting since June, since before our meeting in Waterbury for the information you provided today, and you give me a time limit of six days to respond.  You people are disorganized, arrogant, and slow”  Then they paid me $300.

Want to finish the book, nearly done, but it will be expensive to publish.  Can’t decide if it is a tedious read or not.  In the mean time I will make a directory of all the correspondence I had with the audit team.  It was not nice, but fun to read.

 Time to start the DEP endeavors, filled out a form with the City of Torrington.

Been to court twice.  Prosecutors have not even read their own notes yet.  This will take time.

 

Posted in Audit, Book, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment

Embrace My Nature.

Is it bad luck?  I have been sued by Microsoft for $2 million and survived.  Thrived.  I have been arrested for unlawful restraint and breach of peace while only two people were present, no witnesses against me, we are on video surveillance, and the person accusing me is the girlfriend of a cop killer.  I have been harrassed for months about a bill from ATT that was paid on time, and ATT denied or did not know they were responsible for the harrassment.  I am audited by the State of Connecticut for complaince with Sales Tax laws and they begin by just expecting I will waive the Statute of Limitations for their audit.  Oh, they say, everyone else does it.  The incompetance and malice of authority is striking. 

I worked for the State of Connecticut for 16 years, and many of the people  I worked with seem to think their job is to be a jerk.  I have a commercial driver’s license and have to have physical every two years.  This year DMV threatened to cancel my license after one year, but try to get someone on the phone.  She only would identify herself as Jane and would not listen to the fact that they were wrong, would not tell me how to prove their error to them, and finished with “we are done here” as she hung up the phone. I wrote a letter addressed to the supervisor.  Do you suppose that will help?

There is no end to the examples we can all think of.  And we all know the solution is to simplify.  A physical after two years?  An arrest when it is one person’s word against the other’s?  One must pay sales tax on one’s second car seat, even though the store does not charge you sales tax no matter how many you buy.  Presumably you must send in a check.

The answer is simple.  Yes, it is simplify.  Put an end to mandatory everything.  We must buy all matter of silly stuff to comply with silly laws to pay the salaries of our law makers.  Is that good for the economy?

I guess we will find out.  The first third world country that can reasonably control corruption of the government will have such an advantage over the US that it will overtake our economy like, well, like China.  Like India.  Like Brazil.  Soon even Mexico might be able to, say, improve its infrastructure without first sending permits and insurances to every bureaucrat and inspector from dog catcher to president.  They might be able to get something done while we concentrate on paying the salaries of government agents and sending profits to insurance companies and lawyers.  We are the ones with the problem.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe we had a good economy for a while.  It went on quite too long because of

 

Posted in Audit, Book, Economics, Incompetence, News, Stupid Laws | Leave a comment