Sincerely,
Richard Blumenthal
United States Senate
————————-
It only took him, what? three weeks? In any case I sent this back at him:
Talking to George Hary, supervisor day before yesterday I finally understood that the limit to the Statute of Limitations is only the limit on how long we have to settle after an audit for the books for three years. They will only go back three years, but any irregularities must be settled before the three years is up, and the waiver is to give us more time to settle.
Also it is very possible I will have to charge LESS for taxes for my labor. It is very possible that I should have been charging 1% tax on labor instead of 6.35%. I never bothered with a two-tier tax rate because it is complicated and the customer pays the tax anyway. But since they are making me do all this work I might insist on the money.
So today they will show up and hopefully finish. We have used four reams of paper printing out what they asked for.
Copyright 2012 Kent Johnson
The Supreme Court this week seemed to look at the Arizona immigration laws as a question of whether or not the States can enforce Federal laws. How about we flip that around. Can the States REFUSE to enforce Federal Laws?
In California marijuana is legal, but Federal law still prohibits it. State and municiple law enforcement do not enforce federal anti-marijuana laws (and California still has not fallen into the sea). We all know the issue with immigration. What if some state and some municipality allowed people to live and work without the stupid laws we all know and tolerate as if they were necessary.
Suppose we had places like Mexico within the US where people can sell things from their houses, put up signs, sell stuff on the street. Drugs may not be legal but no one is looking to arrest anyone. It isn’t that they look the other way, or they are corrupt, but they don’t want to stop commerce, they trust their people. They are tolerant of their neighbors.
Hey, there are places like this all over America. And the people are off-the-books, living in a cash economy. Police are hardly tolerated because the mind-set of the Police is not that of a supportive neighbor but rather the Police are seen as people who arrest pretty much anyone they talk to. So no one wants to talk to them. There is very little police presence except when that rare disaster happens.
Suppose these areas of the United States began to grow because people who can’t pay their student loans need to eat. In these areas life is normal, happy, neighborly and busy. In fact, the standard of living in these areas is getting better and that of the little towns of white America is stagnant while we try to absorb welfare couch potatoes.
No one sits on the couch in these places. There is no un-employment, no social workers, no one wants to be on the Federal map. They are off the grid, so to speak, because they want the security of America, the uncorrupt government, but they do not want the rules and regulations.
Copyright 2102 Kent Johnson
Here is a letter I wrote today.
April 27, 2012 Tax Registration #: 8366635-000
George Hary, Tax Unit Manager
WaterburyRegional Office. Audit Division
55 West Main Street
Waterbury,CT06702
Dear Mr. Hary,
Thank you for your undated letter I received on April 17, 2012, which notified me of an informal conference process after my May 3, 2012 audit.
We have spent countless man hours preparing all the paper for the audit as requested in the “List of Documents for Audit” letter. In so doing we have noted that we have grossly overpaid our taxes for computer services which are chargeable at 1% and not 6.35% as we have been paying. Also we should not have collected taxes for web services.
Is it too late for a bi-lateral waiver of the Statute of Limitations so that we can recoup all the taxes we have overpaid during the 17 years we have been in business?
Thank you for your kind attention to the matter.
Kent Johnson, Owner
Barbara Runcie, Taxpayer Advocate.
Have not heard a word from the State about my income tax audit since they sent the updated list of necessary documents, and revised the sanctions against me for not signing the waiver to the Statute of Limitations.
My accounting student has printed over four reams of paper in preparation, and about 60 hours of extra work has gone toward preparation for the audit. Only two vendors have been difficult to contact, don’t return calls, about their reseller certificates.
I have found that I have good reason to charge computer – related labor at 1% sales tax as opposed to the 6% I have always charged (until this year it increased to 6.35%). And web services are non-taxable. So perhaps I should talk to the State again about the Statute of Limitations. Perhaps they will refund a whole heck of a lot of money.
We found a strange exemption to sales tax as well. If you buy one car seat that is sales tax exempt. But if you buy a second one it is not. How the heck is anyone going to know they should pay tax on the second car seat? How will they pay it? If that isn’t a stupid law, please someone explain it to me.
Copyright 2012 Kent Johnson
The housing bubble popped because the government encouraged, through tax loopholes and support of insurance, legal, and government bureaucracy, the spiralling debt of its citizens. The same thing is about to happen now with student loans.
In 2008 people began to notice that the investment houses they bought for a mortgage of $250k (paying as little as 1% of that amount) could not be sold for $251k or more and stopped paying their mortgages. The banks noticed that they had a lot of property and not much money. And no one wanted the property. It was the definition of an economic crash: loss of confidence means loss of value. $250k in value changed overnight to no value; the money just disappeared.
Economists call that a “market correction”. In the stock market you buy stock for $1000 and the next day it is worth $100. The money is gone, and cannot be recovered unless someone else invests and people begin to believe the stock is worth $1000 again. It is a matter of confidence.
In larger terms the entire US economy is a matter of confidence world wide. There is no other currency that enjoys the confidence the world has in the US dollar. If that ever changes we will instantly join the third world, unable to buy imported goods at affordable rates. Our dollar, worth less, will not buy “cheap Chinese goods” anymore.
Today we see all over the news, as though the government is trying to prepare us for a disaster and a new rescue program, that US university students borrowed billions but cannot find jobs. What happens when banks find that no one is paying back their loans? In this case the banks don’t even hold mortgages to empty properties. And many of these loans are guaranteed by the government, and the government has special powers to recoup the money from the former students.
Is this all too complicated? Historically we can see what happens: a new and expensive government bailout is on the way. Almost every penny the ex-students make on the books will go to paying back their loans, and interest accumulates. At minimum wage the loans will take a long time to repay, and they will ex-students will have no take-home pay. The government will need to provide jobs for those who default on loans or they will be consigned forever to the roles of those, like illegal immigrants, who can only work for cash so the government can’t track them and they don’t starve.
I hesitate to explain the only sane alternative at this time because no one, as of yet, seems to understand the problem.
copyright 2012 Kent Johnson
From the Torrington Register Citizen Published February 23, 2012. The original is available at the link below, but I have lightly edited and updated the text below.
http://www.registercitizen.com/articles/2012/02/22/opinion/doc4f45aed025592524008729.txt
Too much for the taxpayer to deal with
I have been looking for a simple way to explain what is wrong with America for a long time and today’s news in the Torrington Register Citizen shows it simply. We have too many laws, too many politicians, too many lawyers, too much government mandated insurance and too many prisoners. The taxpayer just can’t pay for it all.
Innocent children, as many as two million of them nationwide, were brought to this country by cars and trains and boats and planes, and their parents decided to put them in the school system. Because of that decision as many as 35 years ago, and a complicated and seriously broken set of laws, our government has decided to begin deporting them.
These people have broken no laws. There is no law against “being” in America and they were dependent when they arrived. And they are deportable and they have no chance of ever being “legal” in the only country they have ever known. Does anyone think there will be any change to our immigration laws any time soon?
And then there is a guy who began fixing cars in a garage without getting, what, seven or eight permits and licenses? How long should he go to jail?
As a business owner in Torrington I know it is practically impossible to do anything according to the law. So I don’t. I continue what I have been doing for years and not start anything new because, hey, I could go to jail, or go bankrupt trying to avoid breaking way too many laws.
Only government employees and lawyers benefit from these laws. Well, there are also those businesses licensed by government employees to do work and thereby have a government sanctioned monopoly on all work and charge more to pay the taxes, permits, lawyers, professionals and government inspectors.
These are the businesses that hire lobbyists and contribute to campaigns so that they can keep their monopolies. Just ask the guy who wanted to repair cars in his garage. Or Microsoft, who sued me for $2 million dollars and lost.
My industry is not yet licensed, but when it is I will have to charge a lot more for my services. In China they can build a skyscraper or a bridge in a year. In the US we are lucky to break ground in five years or finish in a decade. Watch the U.S. become regulated into bankruptcy and largely unregulated Latin America increase their quality of life because they have newer infrastructure and more productive manufacturing.
The U.S. Congress costs us about a million dollars per congress person per year in salary and benefits paid to each of more than 500 of them. That is over $5 billion (with a B) a year. And they get nothing done. Would we be better off with more politicians? Will we ever have fewer politicians?
I’m just saying there are too many laws, and too many politicians, and too many lawyers, and too many government employees, and too many prisoners, and too many illegal immigrants, and no way to change any of it or pay for it all. If our government were a business it would be time to cut out some overhead. The only people to benefit from our system are the politicians and lawyers and government employees, and the monopolies they created.
Kent Johnson
Compatible Computers
Torrington
The American system borrows money to encourage investment in the industries spending the most money on Congress. Many of the consequences of this system will only be seen when someone has to pay back the loans. We can all see some of the implications, but the irony of our National Student Loan situation is new to me.
As a nation we have a congressional student loan as large a percentage per capita as any individual graduationg our schools systems. And we have not yet graduated. Our governement continues to spend our borrowed money to educate we the people to the importance of all the industries which invest in our Congress. Money we don’t have is invested in protecting our lawyers and the judicial and taxation industries, insurance and environmental industries, and now with the SOPA and PIPA laws the arts and entertainment industries. We are indoctrinated to the necesities of hiring people who add little to the national treasure, and we pay for it with the future earnings of our children.
Our government has already convinced us that making a new law is the way to solve a problem. This supports the growth of our government and its supporting judicial industries such as law enforcment and law and business schools. There are several problems with the social dynamics this system creates, and many of those problems will not be evident until it is time to pay the bill.
But much of the destructive dynamic is evident now. As many as 20 million “illegal” immigrants can work cheaper than Americans because they cannot invest in the system and pay into the welfare and banking systems, creating a huge second American economy suspicious of government. We imprison five times more citizens than other countries costing us over $60 billion yearly. Congress alone costs us over $5 billion yearly. No one knows how much it costs us in mandatory insurances for cars and homes. We have laws that make it impossible to sell a hotdog without insurances, inspections and permits. There is practically nothing we can do that is not illegal in some aspect without first paying for government help.
Government provides the help, of course, with required lawyers and insurances and taxes and permits which are practically if not explicitly required. And those industries dutifully pay back to Congress just enough to be sure the system remains the same, that only those invested in the system get elected. But this system will paid for, in large part, by our children when the bills come due.
When will the bills come due? It seems to me that will happen when confidence slides in the American dollar. Economies are only as strong as the confidence of those invested in it. When confidence slides so does investment. For a long while our economy has enjoyed world confidence, and investments even from our nominal enemies. But now the influences of our indoctrination of our citizens to support industries which produce nothing, and deficit spending higher than the Gross Domestic Product, and almost every developing country growing by leaps and bounds by comparison with us due to the fact that they do not legislate every move by their citizens, it seems inevitable we are headed for an economic fall.
Copyright 2012 Kent Johnson
And all of our Connecticut members of Congress are probably in favor of these stupid, redundant, and anti – First Amendment laws. According to watchdog web sites they have all received significant contributions from Goliaths who want these new laws. Blumenthal, Lieberman and Larson are co-sponsors of the bills and have received millions in contributions for their sponsorship. The rest are in question, but they too have received millions from pro-Goliath groups.
Without your interest or help we will see many big changes in how you use the internet. I left email with all my Congress people and spoke with a representative of Chris Murphy’s office and gave him an earful. Murphy was the only member of Congress available. He received $900k in contributions from SOPA and PIPA supporters and $150k from anti censorship groups according to the watchdogs. How do you think he will vote?
Kent Johnson